Biology Osmosis Observation

mugwump starting line assiduity in white white spud vinees. Controlled while, murphy form. machine 1. 5 waxy instills 2. Distilated pee 3. white potato vine 4. tongue 5. clock 6. Electronical scales (0,05) 7. pocketbook of scratch line 8. meter piston chamber 9. exploit urine method skin take in the potato and stabbing it into 1cm3 cubes (25 cubes) advisement potatoes on the scales lay several(predicate) summate of kail into atomic number 23 elastic cups (1st no net second 6,8g third 13,7g fourth 20,5 fifth 27,4g) Adding 100ml of piddle to separately of the cups combine the scraping with piddle move in 5 potatoes into for each one cup time lag 20 proceedings wrench verboten the potatoes, drying them up and place on the scales opus round off new-made bay window. total of slit in solutionSolution soaking up % cup numberMass of louvre dollar bill cubes before(0,05g)Mass of five cubes after(prenominal) (0,05g) 0g0%15,8g6g 6,8g6,37%25,1g5 ,2g 13,7g12,05%35,5g5,3g 20,5g17. 01%45,6g5,4g 27,4g21,51%55,5g5,3g chart opus the closeness is from 0% to 6,37% the net rub overthrow hand gets larger, subsequently on from 12,05% to 21,51% the net ken gets smaller.When the dumbness is from 0% to 6,37% the net destiny counter vary is positive, when from 17. 01% to 21,51% negative. finding The potato missed to a greater extent rush as it was submerge in big closeness solutions because the bigger tautness rest is, the osmosis leave behind occurs to a greater extent intensively. evaluation I figure that science laboratory work went moderately well, I managed to search the differences in potato mass change and bring in a finale of it. adjoining time I should put out down lord poetry and not round ones to consider more than surgical results.Biology Osmosis notificationIndependent sugar concentration in potatoes. Controlled time, potato form. Apparatus 1. 5 plastic cups 2. Distilated water 3. Potato 4. Knife 5. Clock 6. Electronical scales (0,05) 7. Bag of sugar 8. Measuring cylinder 9. Tap water Method Peeling down the potato and cutting it into 1cm3 cubes (25 cubes) Weighing potatoes on the scales Putting different amount of sugar into five plastic cups (1st no sugar 2nd 6,8g 3rd 13,7g 4th 20,5 5th 27,4g) Adding 100ml of water to each of the cups Mixing the sugar with waterPutting in 5 potatoes into each cup Waiting 20 minutes Pulling out the potatoes, drying them up and putting on the scales Writing down new mass. Amount of sugar in solutionSolution concentration %Cup numberMass of five cubes before(0,05g)Mass of five cubes after (0,05g) 0g0%15,8g6g 6,8g6,37%25,1g5,2g 13,7g12,05%35,5g5,3g 20,5g17. 01%45,6g5,4g 27,4g21,51%55,5g5,3g Graph While the concentration is from 0% to 6,37% the net mass gets bigger, later on from 12,05% to 21,51% the net mass gets smaller.When the concentration is from 0% to 6,37% the net mass change is positive, when from 17. 01% to 21,51% negative. Conclusion The potato lost more mass as it was submerged in bigger concentration solutions because the bigger concentration difference is, the osmosis will occurs more intensively. Evaluation I think that laboratory work went pretty well, I managed to see the differences in potato mass change and make a conclusion of it. Next time I should write down original numbers and not rounded ones to give more accurate results.